McCoy v. Meador

78 S.E. 848, 140 Ga. 253, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 99
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 18, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. While certain matters are set forth in the brief of evidence which properly have no place therein, they are not sufficient to require a ruling that the brief should not be considered in passing on the grounds of the motion for new trial.

2. The suit being upon an open account which defendant denied owing, and no witness having testified as to the sale to the defendant of the goods for the prices of which the action was brought, nor as to the delivery of such goods to the defendant — it not being shown that the salesman was dead or that his testimony could not be procured, and there. not being sufficient evidence to prove the correctness of the account, the verdict in behalf of the plaintiff was without evidence to support it and the court erred in refusing a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Meador, 78 S.E. 848, 140 Ga. 253, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 99 (Ga. 1913).

78 S.E. 848 (McCoy v. Meador) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walburn v. Taunton
130 S.E.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Wolfe v. Brown-Wright Hotel Supply Corp.
73 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Barrington v. Davis Jenkins & Sons
162 S.E. 642 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Millsaps v. Strange Co.
141 S.E. 513 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Lindale Co-operative Store v. Ailey
122 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)