McCoy v. McNab
261 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 640, 313 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1222
This text of 261 N.E.2d 670 (McCoy v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCoy v. McNab, 261 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 640, 313 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1222 (N.Y. 1970).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. When the subscribing witness correctly stated his unchanged residence, but inadvertently referred to its old election district prior to recent redistricting, there was substantial compliance with the statute. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vasti v. May
54 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
261 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 640, 313 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-mcnab-ny-1970.