McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION
747 N.W.2d 296, 480 Mich. 1191
This text of 747 N.W.2d 296 (McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION, 747 N.W.2d 296, 480 Mich. 1191 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Timothy M. McCOY and Robin LaBarge McCoy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and
Schult Homes Corporation, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
747 N.W.2d 296, 480 Mich. 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-lamotte-coachlight-corporation-mich-2008.