McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION
747 N.W.2d 296, 480 Mich. 1191
Opinion
Timothy M. McCOY and Robin LaBarge McCoy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and
Schult Homes Corporation, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION, 747 N.W.2d 296, 480 Mich. 1191 (Mich. 2008).
747 N.W.2d 296 (McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.