McCoy v. Helsby

270 N.E.2d 722, 28 N.Y.2d 790, 321 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1419, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2892
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1971·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would only add that the subjection of the board to certain legislative action, such as the Taylor Law, does not derogate its basic administrative control over the court system, but, rather, only requires the board to be subject to certain reasonable limitations in the exercise of this power. It may be that some future legislative action would so deeply cut at the basic fibre of administrative power as to be violative of section 28 of article VI of the Constitution. The application of the Taylor Law, however, is not such a case.

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. Judge Breitel concurs solely upon the opinion at the Appellate Division. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld and Judge G-ibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Helsby, 270 N.E.2d 722, 28 N.Y.2d 790, 321 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1419, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2892 (N.Y. 1971).

270 N.E.2d 722 (McCoy v. Helsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Correa
70 A.D.3d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Kansas Ass'n of Public Employees v. Public Employee Relations Board
778 P.2d 377 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1989)
Evans v. Newman
71 A.D.2d 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Massachusetts Probation Ass'n v. Commissioner of Administration
352 N.E.2d 684 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)
Utility Workers v. Public Employment Relations Board
49 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Bowne v. County of Nassau
332 N.E.2d 323 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)