McCoy v. Helsby

New York Court of Appeals

McCoy v. Helsby

270 N.E.2d 722, 28 N.Y.2d 790, 321 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1419, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2892

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 270 N.E.2d 722 (McCoy v. Helsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCoy v. Helsby, 270 N.E.2d 722, 28 N.Y.2d 790, 321 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1419, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2892 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would only add that the subjection of the board to certain legislative action, such as the Taylor Law, does not derogate its basic administrative control over the court system, but, rather, only requires the board to be subject to certain reasonable limitations in the exercise of this power. It may be that some future legislative action would so deeply cut at the basic fibre of administrative power as to be violative of section 28 of article VI of the Constitution. The application of the Taylor Law, however, is not such a case.

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. Judge Breitel concurs solely upon the opinion at the Appellate Division. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld and Judge G-ibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would only add that the subjection of the board to certain legislative action, such as the Taylor Law, does not derogate its basic administrative control over the court system, but, rather, only requires the board to be subject to certain reasonable limitations in the exercise of this power. It may be that some future legislative action would so deeply cut at the basic fibre of administrative power as to be violative of section 28 of article VI of the Constitution. The application of the Taylor Law, however, is not such a case.

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. Judge Breitel concurs solely upon the opinion at the Appellate Division. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld and Judge G-ibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 N.E.2d 722, 28 N.Y.2d 790, 321 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1419, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-helsby-ny-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack