McCoy v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Gonzales

219 F. App'x 323

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. 06-1295·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline McCoy appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a) and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCoy v. Gonzales, No. l:05-cv-00371-RLW (E.D.Va. Feb. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline McCoy appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a) and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCoy v. Gonzales, No. l:05-cv-00371-RLW (E.D.Va. Feb. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McCoy v. Gonzales, 219 F. App'x 323 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

219 F. App'x 323 (McCoy v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.