McCoy v. Fowler

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided September 16, 2024·No. 2:22-cv-12237·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Deonte’ McCoy,

Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-12237

v. Honorable Susan K. DeClercq

Nicholas Fowler, et al.,

Defendant. _______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 15, 2024, Magistrate Judge Altman issued a report recommending that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49) be granted. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). They therefore have forfeited their right to appeal Judge Altman’s findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 49) is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED. This is a final order and closes the case. /s/ Susan K. DeClercq SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ United States District Judge

Dated: September 16, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Fowler, (E.D. Mich. 2024).

McCoy v. Fowler (McCoy v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Randy Berkshire v. Debra Dahl
928 F.3d 520 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)