McCoy v. Flora

551 F. App'x 82
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7605
StatusPublished

This text of 551 F. App'x 82 (McCoy v. Flora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy v. Flora, 551 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Wesley McCoy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McCoy v. Flora, No. 1:13—cv-01032-AJT-TRJ (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 28, 2013; entered Aug. 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 F. App'x 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-flora-ca4-2014.