McCoy v. Enloe

Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Enloe

438 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2011·No. No. 10-7760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terrell McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Enloe, No. 9:09-cv-02958-RMG, 2010 WL 4929341 (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 2010). We deny McCoy’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Terrell McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Enloe, No. 9:09-cv-02958-RMG, 2010 WL 4929341 (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 2010). We deny McCoy’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McCoy v. Enloe, 438 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

438 F. App'x 242 (McCoy v. Enloe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related