McCoy v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., LP

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCoy v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., LP

350 S.W.3d 69, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320, 2011 WL 4790776

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2011·No. ED 96115·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy McCoy appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy McCoy appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

McCoy v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., LP, 350 S.W.3d 69, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320, 2011 WL 4790776 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

350 S.W.3d 69 (McCoy v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related