McCoy v. Cox
Opinions
The following sections of the Code determine the question before us.
“ Sec.(3567. The party obtaining a judgment in a justice’s court for more than ten dollars may cause a transcript thereof to be certified to the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court in the county.
“ Sec. 3568. The clerk shall forthwith file such transcript, and enter a memorandum thereof in his judgment docket, noting the time of filing the same, and from the time of such filing it shall be treated, in all respects as to its effect and mode of enforcement, as a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court as of hhat date, and no execution can thereafter be issued by the justice on that judgment.”
The language of Sec. 3568 is explicit. It expressly provides that the transcript shall be filed and entered in the judgment docket, and thenceforward “it shall be treated, in all respects as to its effect and manner of enforcement, as a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of that date.”
The effect of a judgment in the Circuit Court is as follows:
1. It is a lien upon real estate for ten years.
2. It may be enforced for twenty years. Code, § § 3025, 2529, ¶ 6.
The manner of enforcement of such a judgment is by execution.
It follows that, as the judgment in question “is to be treated, in all respects as to its effect and manner of enforcement, as a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court,” an execution may issue thereon at any time within twenty years.
It was the view of the court below that the object of Code, § § 3567 and 3568, is to provide for the enforcement of judgments rendered by justices against real estate. That, doubtless, was one object, and the provisions give them such [597]*597effect. But under the language of the statute they are to have the effect, in every respect, of judgments of the Circuit Court. The effect of judgments in the Circuit Court is to bind the defendants therein for twenty years, and to be enforceable during that time by execution.
In our opinion the judgment of the District Court is erroneous; it is, therefore,
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 N.W. 44 (McCoy v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.