McCoy v. City of Birmingham
102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 686
This text of 102 So. 923 (McCoy v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCoy v. City of Birmingham, 102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 686 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
This cause is pending in the court on the certificate of appeal only. Appellee makes his motion for an affirmance, but does not conform to the requirements of section 6111 of the Code of 1923. The motion to affirm must be denied, but the court ex mero motu dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-city-of-birmingham-alactapp-1925.