McCoy v. Canterbury

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1017

ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00368)

Submitted: May 2, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elsibeth Brandee McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges, Stephanie Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Elsibeth Brandee McCoy appeals the district court’s

order dismissing her action filed under Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for

the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Canterbury,

No. 3:10-cv-00368 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 20 & 21, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED