McCoy, Ex Parte Johnny Valentine

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 2008
DocketAP-75,929
StatusPublished

This text of McCoy, Ex Parte Johnny Valentine (McCoy, Ex Parte Johnny Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy, Ex Parte Johnny Valentine, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,929

EX PARTE JOHNNY VALENTINE MCCOY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 06-10-29714-CR(1) IN THE 221 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to felony driving

while intoxicated, and was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because Applicant pleaded guilty under the

erroneous belief that he was eligible for and would be considered for release on “shock” probation

after he had served 75 days in prison. Trial counsel and the prosecutor have both filed affidavits with the trial court. Based on

those affidavits, the trial court determined that Applicant’s plea was not knowingly and voluntarily

entered, because he, his trial counsel, and the prosecutor all erroneously believed that Applicant was

eligible for shock probation. It was not until Applicant had served 75 days in prison, and had been

brought back so that the trial court could consider shock probation, that the parties realized that

Applicant was ineligible for shock probation because he had previously been convicted of a felony

for which he had served time in the penitentiary. The trial court finds that Applicant would not have

pleaded guilty to this charge had he known that he was not eligible for shock probation. Applicant

is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 06-10-09714-CR(1) in the 221st Judicial

District Court of Montgomery County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the trial court to

answer the charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 4, 2008 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Huerta
692 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McCoy, Ex Parte Johnny Valentine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-ex-parte-johnny-valentine-texcrimapp-2008.