McCown v. Quigley
23 A. 805, 147 Pa. 307, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 837
Opinion
All of the specifications which allege error in the admission of evidence, may be dismissed by the remark that they are not assigned in conformity with the rules of court. The remaining 'specifications all refer to the charge of the court. An examination of them fails to disclose error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCown v. Quigley, 23 A. 805, 147 Pa. 307, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 837 (Pa. 1892).
23 A. 805 (McCown v. Quigley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn Electric Supply Co. v. Billows Electric Supply Co.
528 A.2d 643 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Penn Elec. Sup. v. Billows Elec. Sup.
528 A.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)