McCowan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCowan v. State

307 So. 2d 194, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1975

DocketNo. 74-1349

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 307 So. 2d 194 (McCowan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCowan v. State, 307 So. 2d 194, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 So. 2d 194, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccowan-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack