McCourt v. Petagna

61 A.2d 239, 137 N.J.L. 611, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 3, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellob, Chibe Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Bubling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Fbeund, McLean, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCourt v. Petagna, 61 A.2d 239, 137 N.J.L. 611, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1948).

61 A.2d 239 (McCourt v. Petagna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hedden v. Folio
163 A.2d 163 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)