McCoun & Sherman v. Rowley & Bulkley

19 Wend. 85
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, Ch. J.

The practice at the circuit formerly was, when a cause was reached on the calendar and it was conceded by both parties that the trial would require the examination of a long account, to- make an order of reference; but not otherwise. The circuit judge no doubt has the right to make such order, if it be made to appear to him that the trial of the cause will require the examination of a long account; but both parties should be heard, or it should be shown that reasonable notice had been given to the party who does not appear, or to his counsel.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoun & Sherman v. Rowley & Bulkley, 19 Wend. 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1837).

19 Wend. 85 (McCoun & Sherman v. Rowley & Bulkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helena Adjustment Co. v. Predivich
37 P.2d 651 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Buchanan v. Cheseborough
5 Duer 238 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1856)