McCoun & Sherman v. Rowley & Bulkley
This text of 19 Wend. 85 (McCoun & Sherman v. Rowley & Bulkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The practice at the circuit formerly was, when a cause was reached on the calendar and it was conceded by both parties that the trial would require the examination of a long account, to- make an order of reference; but not otherwise. The circuit judge no doubt has the right to make such order, if it be made to appear to him that the trial of the cause will require the examination of a long account; but both parties should be heard, or it should be shown that reasonable notice had been given to the party who does not appear, or to his counsel.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Wend. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoun-sherman-v-rowley-bulkley-nysupct-1837.