McCorvey v. Florida Parole Commission

625 So. 2d 1296, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11204, 1993 WL 435907
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 1993
Docket91-1020
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1296 (McCorvey v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCorvey v. Florida Parole Commission, 625 So. 2d 1296, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11204, 1993 WL 435907 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

625 So.2d 1296 (1993)

Jimmy McCorvey, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 91-1020.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 29, 1993.

*1297 Jimmy McCorvey, pro se.

James S. Byrd, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.

REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee's motion for rehearing, the original opinion is withdrawn and the following opinion substituted therefor. In light of this revised opinion, the motion for rehearing is denied.

Jimmy McCorvey appeals an order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus filed after the Florida Parole Commission suspended his presumptive parole release date (PPRD). The Commission expressly based the suspension of appellant's PPRD on information it considered when it initially set the PPRD and on psychological reports that the Commission describes as indicating "underlying hostility and a potential for aggressive behavior."

We reject McCorvey's contention that the Commission abused its discretion in suspending his PPRD on the basis of previously-considered information. The law is well settled that, pursuant to section 947.18, Florida Statutes, the Commission may decline to authorize an inmate's release on the basis of information that was previously considered, or available for consideration, when it set the inmate's PPRD. Florida Parole and Probation Commission v. Paige, 462 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1985); Parole and Probation Commission v. Bruce, 471 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1985).

However, we are unable to determine whether McCorvey's second contention, that the psychological reports on which the Commission based the suspension do not support the suspension, is meritorious as the court record does not contain those reports. Adequate review of the Commission's decision to suspend appellant's PPRD cannot be performed in the absence of the portions of the inmate's official record relied on by the Commission to support its recited reasons. Williams v. Florida Parole Commission, 625 So.2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We reverse and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Williams.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. Florida Parole Commission
939 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Welsch v. State
823 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Myers v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
705 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Horsted v. Florida Parole Commission
673 So. 2d 891 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Johnson v. Florida Parole Commission
639 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 1296, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11204, 1993 WL 435907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccorvey-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1993.