McCormick v. State

323 S.W.2d 462, 168 Tex. Crim. 60, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2449
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 29, 1959·No. 30550·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is under Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. for the giving of a worthless check in the amount of $12.95, with punishment assessed at 15 days in jail and a fine of $25.

Our State’s Attorney confesses that there is no valid complaint upon which to base the information.

The complaint fails to allege that the check was given with intent to defraud. The intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense. Art. 567b, Sec. 1, supra; Kuykendall v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 607, 160 S.W.2d 525. Being an essential element of the offense, such intent should have been alleged in the complaint. Browder v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 375, 292 S.W.2d 342.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Addison v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 283 S.W.2d 55.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCormick v. State, 323 S.W.2d 462, 168 Tex. Crim. 60, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2449 (Tex. 1959).

323 S.W.2d 462 (McCormick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burleson v. State
403 S.W.2d 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Richardson v. State
332 S.W.2d 736 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Wright v. State
168 Tex. Crim. 214 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)