McCormick v. State
This text of 57 A.D.2d 1010 (McCormick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did the Court of Claims err as a matter of law in denying the cross-motion by claimants for permission to amend the claim to include the East Hudson Parkway Authority as a party defendant?” Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.2d 1010, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-state-nyappdiv-1977.