McCormick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCormick v. State

190 So. 3d 704, 2016 WL 3017419, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 2016

DocketNo. 1D15-950

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 704 (McCormick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCormick v. State, 190 So. 3d 704, 2016 WL 3017419, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s revocation of probation, but remand for correction of Appellant’s sentence. The State concedes that Appellant “should have only received six points on his scoresheet for the community sanction violation points assessed.” As such, we remand to allow the trial court to enter a corrected sentence based on a corrected scoresheet.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s revocation of probation, but remand for correction of Appellant’s sentence. The State concedes that Appellant “should have only received six points on his scoresheet for the community sanction violation points assessed.” As such, we remand to allow the trial court to enter a corrected sentence based on a corrected scoresheet.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 3d 704, 2016 WL 3017419, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.