McCormick v. State
23 So. 3d 1259, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20364, 2009 WL 5125426
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCormick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 961 So. 2d 1099 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to any right Mr. McCormick may have to file a timely and facially sufficient motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking to withdraw his plea on the ground that it was involuntary because he was misadvised as to whether the East Pasco County sentences would be concurrent to previously imposed West Pasco County sentences. See Sawyers v. State, 566 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Raben v. State, 715 So.2d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCormick v. State, 23 So. 3d 1259, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20364, 2009 WL 5125426 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
23 So. 3d 1259 (McCormick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sawyers v. State
566 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
RABEN III v. State
715 So. 2d 331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)