McCormick v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

McCormick v. State

115 So. 844, 95 Fla. 518

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 22, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The probative force and effect of the evidence in this case is such that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 Sou. Rep. 428, and it is so ordered.

Eeversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J.. concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The probative force and effect of the evidence in this case is such that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 Sou. Rep. 428, and it is so ordered.

Eeversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J.. concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

McCormick v. State, 115 So. 844, 95 Fla. 518 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

115 So. 844 (McCormick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related