McCormick v. Shea
97 N.Y.S. 358
This text of 97 N.Y.S. 358 (McCormick v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCormick v. Shea, 97 N.Y.S. 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
Opinion
Under the circumstances the defendant should have had a reasonable adjournment, and the "motion to open the default should have been granted without the imposition of terms.
The order appealed from will be modified by striking out so much thereof as imposed costs upon defendant, and as so modified will be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 N.Y.S. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-shea-nyappterm-1906.