McCormick v. Leonard

38 Iowa 272
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 29, 1874·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Day., J.

— It appears from the statement of facts that the mortgage to Johnson was first executed, but that it was not filed for record until after the execution of the mortgage to plaintiffs. It is alleged that plaintiffs had knowledge, at the [273]*273time they accepted their mortgage, of this prior mortgage to Johnson.

. This question of fact is the only one which we need consider. Notice is alleged by defendant, and upon him is the burden of establishing it. The testimony seems to be in exact equilibrio. One witness testifies that the agent of plaintiff was informed, at the time he accepted plaintiff’s mortgage, of the prior one to Johnson. The agent positively denies that he had such knowledge. Neither witness is discredited. There are no circumstances corroborative of the statements of either.

Under such circumstances the court below rightly determined that the' party upon whom was the burden of proof had failed to establish his case.

Aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCormick v. Leonard, 38 Iowa 272 (iowa 1874).

38 Iowa 272 (McCormick v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Hamilton
240 N.W. 705 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1932)
Walter v. Brown
88 N.W. 832 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Lee
68 N.W. 170 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Hoskins v. Carter
24 N.W. 249 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1885)