McCormick v. Lennox

1 White & W. 277
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 18, 1880
DocketNo. 718, Op. Book No. 2, p. 662
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 277 (McCormick v. Lennox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCormick v. Lennox, 1 White & W. 277 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 550. Parol evidence not admissible to vary a written instrument. Parol evidence is not admissible to vary the plain and unambiguous language of a written instrument. The consideration for which the notes sued on were given, as shown by the notes, was a McCormick’s machine. There is no evidence in the record tending to show that the appellees attempted to return the machine within a'reasonable time. Because the court erred in admitting parol evidence to vary the written contract, and because there is no evidence to show a return in good faith within a reasonable time, the judgment is

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-lennox-texapp-1880.