McCormick v. Franklin

5 A.D.3d 685, 774 N.Y.S.2d 757
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.D.3d 685 (McCormick v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCormick v. Franklin, 5 A.D.3d 685, 774 N.Y.S.2d 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father [686]*686appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Cooney, J.), dated July 2, 2002, which dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute the appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, Andrew W Szczesniak is relieved as attorney for the appellant, and he is directed to turn over to new counsel assigned herein all papers in his possession; and it is further,

Ordered that Frank Marocco, Esq., 175 Main Street, White Plains, N.Y. 10601 (845) 940-1880 is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant on or before May 24, 2004.

A nonfrivolous issue exists on this record as to whether the Family Court erred in concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the petition (see Vernon v Vernon, 100 NY2d 960, 969-971 [2003]; Corkins v Corkins, 253 AD2d 783 [1998]). Accordingly, the motion of the petitioner’s assigned counsel is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned (see Matter of Joseph B., 307 AD2d 996 [2003]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strand-O'Shea v. Kraemer
85 A.D.3d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 685, 774 N.Y.S.2d 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-franklin-nyappdiv-2004.