McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company
44 N.E. 1124, 150 N.Y. 584, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1054
This text of 44 N.E. 1124 (McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company, 44 N.E. 1124, 150 N.Y. 584, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1054 (N.Y. 1896).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Andrews,. Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett and Martin, JJ.
Dissent: Haight and Vann, JJ.
Not sitting: Gray, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Unger v. Belt Line Railway Corp.
182 A.D. 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 N.E. 1124, 150 N.Y. 584, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-brooklyn-city-railroad-company-ny-1896.