McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company
44 N.E. 1124, 150 N.Y. 584, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1054
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Andrews,. Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett and Martin, JJ.
Dissent: Haight and Vann, JJ.
Not sitting: Gray, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company, 44 N.E. 1124, 150 N.Y. 584, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1054 (N.Y. 1896).
44 N.E. 1124 (McCormick v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Unger v. Belt Line Railway Corp.
182 A.D. 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)