McCormack v. State

226 So. 3d 871, 2017 WL 3499924
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2017·No. No. 4D15-2886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[872]*872 On Motion for Rehearing

May, J.

We grant the State’s motion for rehearing. In its motion, the State advised the court that the record submitted on appeal failed to include the order denying the defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procédure 3.800(b)(2), which addressed Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016). In fact, the record included an affidavit attesting “there had been no order addressing the 4-12-16 Motion to. Correct Sentencing Error.” This was the sole basis for our reversal.

The State has now filed the order and the transcript from the hearing on the Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion. We supplement the record with both, withdraw our prior opinion, and affirm on all issues raised in the appeal.

Affirmed.

Taylor and Ciklin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCormack v. State, 226 So. 3d 871, 2017 WL 3499924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

226 So. 3d 871 (McCormack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related