McCormack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCormack v. State

226 So. 3d 871, 2017 WL 3499924

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 2017

DocketNo. 4D15-2886

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 So. 3d 871 (McCormack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCormack v. State, 226 So. 3d 871, 2017 WL 3499924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[872]*872 On Motion for Rehearing

May, J.

We grant the State’s motion for rehearing. In its motion, the State advised the court that the record submitted on appeal failed to include the order denying the defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procédure 3.800(b)(2), which addressed Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016). In fact, the record included an affidavit attesting “there had been no order addressing the 4-12-16 Motion to. Correct Sentencing Error.” This was the sole basis for our reversal.

The State has now filed the order and the transcript from the hearing on the Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion. We supplement the record with both, withdraw our prior opinion, and affirm on all issues raised in the appeal.

Affirmed.

Taylor and Ciklin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI