McCormack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCormack v. State

797 So. 2d 648, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15008, 2001 WL 1267382

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 24, 2001

DocketNo. 3D01-2446

StatusPublished

This text of 797 So. 2d 648 (McCormack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCormack v. State, 797 So. 2d 648, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15008, 2001 WL 1267382 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant McCormack’s petition for writ of certiorari and quash paragraph seven of the order granting Plaintiffs Verified Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin finding McCormack in contempt of court. As the state properly concedes in its response, the record does not demonstrate “any act that is contemptuous on its face.” Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So.2d 489, 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). See Parisi v. Broward County, 769 So.2d 369 (Fla.2000).

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant McCormack’s petition for writ of certiorari and quash paragraph seven of the order granting Plaintiffs Verified Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin finding McCormack in contempt of court. As the state properly concedes in its response, the record does not demonstrate “any act that is contemptuous on its face.” Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So.2d 489, 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). See Parisi v. Broward County, 769 So.2d 369 (Fla.2000).

Certiorari granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

797 So. 2d 648, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15008, 2001 WL 1267382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormack-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack