McCorkle v. Ellis

35 Misc. 833, 72 N.Y.S. 1117
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1901·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record offered in evidence was not exemplified as required by the Bevised Statutes of the United States, section 905; neither can the transcript of the justice with the certificate of the county clerk attached be availed of, as Texas is not ah adjoining State. Code Civ. Pro., § 948; Bent v. Glaenzer, 17 Misc. Rep. 569. The only other method of proving the jurisdictional fact is by common-law- proof.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to. abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCorkle v. Ellis, 35 Misc. 833, 72 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

35 Misc. 833 (McCorkle v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bent v. Glaenzer
17 Misc. 569 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)