McCorkel v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McCorkel v. First National Bank

98 S.E. 398, 23 Ga. App. 463, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 157

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 18, 1919

Docket9817, 9821

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 398 (McCorkel v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCorkel v. First National Bank, 98 S.E. 398, 23 Ga. App. 463, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 157 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge, when considered . in the light of the evidence and the entire ch’arge, are erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

[464]*464Decided February 18, 1919. Rehearing denied February 27, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Statesboro—Judge Proctor. May 13, 1918.

Johnston & Cone, for McCorkel. Brannen & Booth, Anderson & Jones, Dead & Renfroe, Hunter & Jones, contra.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which excepts to the failure of the court‘to give certain specific instructions to the jury is without merit. The charge given covered the particular issue, and if more specific instructions were desired thereon, a proper and timely written request therefor should have been made.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed on the main hill of exceptions; cross-hill dismissed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI