McCord v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCord v. State

923 So. 2d 1289, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4634, 2006 WL 847116

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 2006

DocketNo. 5D05-3815

StatusPublished

This text of 923 So. 2d 1289 (McCord v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCord v. State, 923 So. 2d 1289, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4634, 2006 WL 847116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM.

Cary McCord has filed multiple post-conviction proceedings in this court attacking his conviction and habitual felony offender sentence in Sumter County circuit court case number 97-247-CF, on the charge of robbery with a firearm. In his current petition for writ of habeas corpus, [1290]*1290McCord improperly advances a collateral attack on his conviction- and sentence, which is procedurally barred. -McCord was ordered to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court to further attack that conviction and sentence. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). We have carefully reviewed McCord’s response to our order and find no merit thereto.

Accordingly, in order to preserve judicial resources, McCord is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions or petitions in this court relating to Sumter County circuit court case number 97-247-CF. Any further proceedings filed in this court relating to McCord’s conviction and sentence in that case must be reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of the Florida Bar. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se pleadings from McCord in the above-styled case.

FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

SHARP, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM.

Cary McCord has filed multiple post-conviction proceedings in this court attacking his conviction and habitual felony offender sentence in Sumter County circuit court case number 97-247-CF, on the charge of robbery with a firearm. In his current petition for writ of habeas corpus, [1290]*1290McCord improperly advances a collateral attack on his conviction- and sentence, which is procedurally barred. -McCord was ordered to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court to further attack that conviction and sentence. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). We have carefully reviewed McCord’s response to our order and find no merit thereto.

Accordingly, in order to preserve judicial resources, McCord is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions or petitions in this court relating to Sumter County circuit court case number 97-247-CF. Any further proceedings filed in this court relating to McCord’s conviction and sentence in that case must be reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of the Florida Bar. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se pleadings from McCord in the above-styled case.

FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

SHARP, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

923 So. 2d 1289, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4634, 2006 WL 847116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccord-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack