McCool v. Mickler

Indiana Court of Appeals

McCool v. Mickler

124 N.E. 467, 71 Ind. App. 190, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 256

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 1910

DocketNo. 9,963

StatusPublished

This text of 124 N.E. 467 (McCool v. Mickler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCool v. Mickler, 124 N.E. 467, 71 Ind. App. 190, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 256 (Ind. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

' Nichols, P. J.

— The only error assigned in this court is that the trial court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial, in which motion it is specified that each of the special findings of fact, numbered from 1 to 21 inclusive, is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

Notwithstanding the rule, so well established that we do not need to cite authorities, that the Appellate Court will not weigh the evidence, when á substantial conflict exists, we have in this case carefully examined the evidence contained in the briefs of the parties, and we find it ample to sustain the finding of the court. Nothing can be gained by making further statement of the case. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

' Nichols, P. J.

— The only error assigned in this court is that the trial court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial, in which motion it is specified that each of the special findings of fact, numbered from 1 to 21 inclusive, is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

Notwithstanding the rule, so well established that we do not need to cite authorities, that the Appellate Court will not weigh the evidence, when á substantial conflict exists, we have in this case carefully examined the evidence contained in the briefs of the parties, and we find it ample to sustain the finding of the court. Nothing can be gained by making further statement of the case. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 N.E. 467, 71 Ind. App. 190, 1910 Ind. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccool-v-mickler-indctapp-1910.