McCook v. Moore
This text of 2 S.E. 473 (McCook v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Moore sued McCook in a justice’s court and obtained a judgment. McCook appealed to a jury. Moore obtained a verdict in his favor. An agreement had been entered into between the counsel for Moore and McCook that the case should be continued at the time the verdict was rendered in the justice’s court; it was further agreed between the parties, by their attorneys, that the verdict should be set aside. This agreement was in writing. Upon motion before the justice, he refused to set aside the verdict. This judgment was carried to the superior court by certiorari. The court affirmed the judgment of the justice, and this is excepted to, and error is assigned on said exception to this court.
A justice’s court has no power to grant a new trial. The law does not confer such power upon a justice’s court. But conceding that the justice might have granted a new trial by consent of all parties, yet there is no law that compels him to do so. Those inferior judicatories are not allowed by the law to interfere with any judgment they may render, upon the principle that, having rendered judgment, their jurisdiction of the matter ends. We are of the opinion that the ruling of the court below was right, and judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 S.E. 473, 78 Ga. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccook-v-moore-ga-1887.