McCooey v. Alenikov

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCooey v. Alenikov

63 A.D.3d 1660, 879 N.Y.S.2d 742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 2009

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 1660 (McCooey v. Alenikov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCooey v. Alenikov, 63 A.D.3d 1660, 879 N.Y.S.2d 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Herkimer County (Anthony J. Garramone, J.H.O.), entered March 12, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the violation petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985 [1994]). Present—Martoche, J.P, Smith, Fahey, Garni and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Herkimer County (Anthony J. Garramone, J.H.O.), entered March 12, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the violation petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985 [1994]). Present—Martoche, J.P, Smith, Fahey, Garni and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.3d 1660, 879 N.Y.S.2d 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccooey-v-alenikov-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack