McConville v. New York Central Railroad

229 A.D. 821

This text of 229 A.D. 821 (McConville v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConville v. New York Central Railroad, 229 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents on [822]*822the ground that there is a question of fact as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconville-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1930.