McConoughey v. Torrence

California Supreme Court

McConoughey v. Torrence

124 Cal. 330

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1899

DocketL. A. No. 722

StatusPublished

This text of 124 Cal. 330 (McConoughey v. Torrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConoughey v. Torrence, 124 Cal. 330 (Cal. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to settle a statement on appeal. The appeal was taken within sixty days after July 28, 1898. The refusal [331]*331to settle the statement was made final and definite by an order of respondent made and entered October 11, 1898. This proceeding to compel settlement was not commenced until March 24, 1899, and the application must be denied upon the ground of laches. (Depeaux v. Peck, 118 Cal. 522.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to settle a statement on appeal. The appeal was taken within sixty days after July 28, 1898. The refusal [331]*331to settle the statement was made final and definite by an order of respondent made and entered October 11, 1898. This proceeding to compel settlement was not commenced until March 24, 1899, and the application must be denied upon the ground of laches. (Depeaux v. Peck, 118 Cal. 522.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Cal. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconoughey-v-torrence-cal-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack