Home/New York Court of Appeals/McConnon v. Catalano

McConnon v. Catalano

352 N.E.2d 141, 39 N.Y.2d 881, 386 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2819
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 3, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 N.E.2d 141 (McConnon v. Catalano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConnon v. Catalano, 352 N.E.2d 141, 39 N.Y.2d 881, 386 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2819 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Memorandum. If there was error in the trial court’s charge to the jury it was not preserved for review by this court (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 115, p 494). We have examined the appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit.

[883]*883Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyons v. De Vore
354 N.E.2d 848 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 N.E.2d 141, 39 N.Y.2d 881, 386 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnon-v-catalano-ny-1976.