McConnell v. Williams Steamship Co.

143 Misc. 426, 256 N.Y.S. 858, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1037
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 1, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the action against these defendants is not based on the theory that they are responsible for the torts of their seamen upon the principle of respondeat superior, but upon the ground that in the particular case they were negligent in the employment of the crew and in other respects. In other words, the [428] gravamen of the complaint is negligence and not assault and battery. The City Court has no jurisdiction of such an action where a judgment in excess of $3,000 is demanded. (New York City Court Act, §§ 16, 17.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend within six days after service of order entered hereon on payment of said costs and disbursements.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Fbankenthaleb, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. Williams Steamship Co., 143 Misc. 426, 256 N.Y.S. 858, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

143 Misc. 426 (McConnell v. Williams Steamship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arsenis v. Atlantic Tankers, Ltd.
39 Misc. 2d 124 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Ussop v. American West African Line, Inc.
151 Misc. 12 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)
McConnell v. Williams Steamship Co.
146 Misc. 512 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)