McConnell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McConnell v. State

645 S.E.2d 657, 285 Ga. App. 177

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 26, 2007

DocketA07A0751

StatusPublished

This text of 645 S.E.2d 657 (McConnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConnell v. State, 645 S.E.2d 657, 285 Ga. App. 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Phipps, Judge.

Eric McConnell appeals his convictions of armed robbery and aggravated assault. He argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, even though the victim and a bystander identified him as the individual who had accosted and pistol whipped the victim as he was walking down the street, police apprehended him in the vicinity of the crimes shortly after their commission based on the description provided by the victim, and he was found in possession of an item of personal property taken from the victim and of a handgun that could have been used in perpetration of the crimes. McConnell’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is thus without merit.¹

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur. [178]*178Decided April 26, 2007. Gerald P. Privin, for appellant. Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Suhirjahaan S. Morehead, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phipps, Judge.

Eric McConnell appeals his convictions of armed robbery and aggravated assault. He argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, even though the victim and a bystander identified him as the individual who had accosted and pistol whipped the victim as he was walking down the street, police apprehended him in the vicinity of the crimes shortly after their commission based on the description provided by the victim, and he was found in possession of an item of personal property taken from the victim and of a handgun that could have been used in perpetration of the crimes. McConnell’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is thus without merit.¹

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur. [178]*178Decided April 26, 2007. Gerald P. Privin, for appellant. Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Suhirjahaan S. Morehead, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 S.E.2d 657, 285 Ga. App. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-v-state-gactapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack