McConnell v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McConnell v. Selsky

196 A.D.2d 841, 603 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 841 (McConnell v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConnell v. Selsky, 196 A.D.2d 841, 603 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent John Mahony, dated November 21, 1990, which was affirmed by the respondent Don Selsky on January 29, 1991, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner to be in violation of prison disciplinary rules 113.10 and 113.12, and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, we find that there was substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner had violated prison disciplinary rules 113.10 and 113.12 (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130; People ex rel. Baptiste v Smith, 115 AD2d 225). We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent John Mahony, dated November 21, 1990, which was affirmed by the respondent Don Selsky on January 29, 1991, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner to be in violation of prison disciplinary rules 113.10 and 113.12, and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, we find that there was substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner had violated prison disciplinary rules 113.10 and 113.12 (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130; People ex rel. Baptiste v Smith, 115 AD2d 225). We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 841, 603 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-v-selsky-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack