McConnell v. Karantinos

180 So. 23, 131 Fla. 775, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1481
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 So. 23 (McConnell v. Karantinos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConnell v. Karantinos, 180 So. 23, 131 Fla. 775, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1481 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record, and the briefs and argument of counsel, the court finds no reversible error in the record, and the order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Gove v. Nautilus Hotel Company, 68 Fla. 490, 67 So. 112; Tide Water Construction Company v. Monroe County, 107 Fla. 648, 146 So. 209, and Webster v. Clark, 34 Fla. 633, 16 So. 601.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uhrig v. Redding, Et Ux.
8 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 So. 23, 131 Fla. 775, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-v-karantinos-fla-1938.