McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA

20 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15927, 2009 WL 3398713
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 2009·No. 5D07-4329·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Price v. Abate, 9 So.3d 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that it is essential to validity of will or codicil for witnesses to sign in presence of testator and each other); see also § 733.502, Fla. Stat. (2008); Jordan v. Fehr, 902 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Simpson v. Williamson, 611 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA, 20 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15927, 2009 WL 3398713 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

20 So. 3d 451 (McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price v. Abate
9 So. 3d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jordan v. Fehr
902 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Simpson v. Williamson
611 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)