Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA

McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA

20 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15927, 2009 WL 3398713
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 2009
Docket5D07-4329
StatusPublished

This text of 20 So. 3d 451 (McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConnell v. ESTATE OF FALLETTA, 20 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15927, 2009 WL 3398713 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Price v. Abate, 9 So.3d 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that it is essential to validity of will or codicil for witnesses to sign in presence of testator and each other); see also § 733.502, Fla. Stat. (2008); Jordan v. Fehr, 902 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Simpson v. Williamson, 611 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Abate
9 So. 3d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jordan v. Fehr
902 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Simpson v. Williamson
611 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15927, 2009 WL 3398713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-v-estate-of-falletta-fladistctapp-2009.