McConnell v. Bryant

38 Ga. 639
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Brown, C. J.

The defendant in this case filed the affidavit authorized by the statute, which, with the plaintiff’s affidavit, in the language of the statute, formed an issue to be returned to the Court, and tried as other causes.” See Revised Code, secs. 1970, 1972.

When the defendant, McConnell, failed to appear and defend, as the issue was pending in the Court on the appeal, the plaintiff had a right to proceed ex parte, to make out his case. But he was bound to make out a prima facie case, by evidence to the jury, before he was entitled to a judgment. And after the issue was made up in Court, he had no right to proceed further with his affidavit or execution, till he obtained a judgment, and sued out an execution upon that judgment.

[641]*641We think the Court erred in ruling that the defendant’s affidavit be dismissed, and that the execution proceed, and we, therefore, order that the judgment be reversed, and that the cause be remanded for another hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. Bryant, 38 Ga. 639 (Ga. 1869).

38 Ga. 639 (McConnell v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Nichols
56 S.E. 995 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Murphey v. McGough
31 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)