McConnell v. Beach Realty Co.
36 A.2d 604, 131 N.J.L. 325, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 197
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodinb, Donges, IIeher, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson. Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McConnell v. Beach Realty Co., 36 A.2d 604, 131 N.J.L. 325, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 197 (N.J. 1944).
36 A.2d 604 (McConnell v. Beach Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vuarnet Footwear, Inc. v. Sea-Rail Services Corp.
759 A.2d 1230 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Heyman v. Linwood Park
125 A.2d 345 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Pable v. Zebrowski
83 A.2d 352 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)