McConnell v. Baker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

McConnell v. Baker

169 S.E. 842, 170 S.C. 111, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 144

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 14, 1933

Docket13652

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 842 (McConnell v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConnell v. Baker, 169 S.E. 842, 170 S.C. 111, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 144 (S.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This appeal is from an order of Judge Foster of the Spartanburg County Court, which sustains the judgment for the respondent given in the Court of Magistrate Ballenger. The issues properly involved in the case are clearly stated in the order of Judge Foster, and are disposed of in a manner satisfactory to this Court. It is needless to review the authorities which our investigation has found to be applicable. It is sufficient to say that the strong majority opinions of these authorities are in consonance with the conclusions reached by the order of Judge Foster. The annotation attached to the case of Richmond Dry Goods Company v. Wil son, 105 W. Va., 221, 141 S. E., 876, 57 A. L. R., 31-33, and the opinion in that case itself, are especially in point. See, also, 39 C. J., 153, §§ 205, 206.

The exceptions are overruled and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Ret it be reported.

Mr. Chiee Justice Brease and Messrs. Justices StabrEr and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This appeal is from an order of Judge Foster of the Spartanburg County Court, which sustains the judgment for the respondent given in the Court of Magistrate Ballenger. The issues properly involved in the case are clearly stated in the order of Judge Foster, and are disposed of in a manner satisfactory to this Court. It is needless to review the authorities which our investigation has found to be applicable. It is sufficient to say that the strong majority opinions of these authorities are in consonance with the conclusions reached by the order of Judge Foster. The annotation attached to the case of Richmond Dry Goods Company v. Wil son, 105 W. Va., 221, 141 S. E., 876, 57 A. L. R., 31-33, and the opinion in that case itself, are especially in point. See, also, 39 C. J., 153, §§ 205, 206.

The exceptions are overruled and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Ret it be reported.

Mr. Chiee Justice Brease and Messrs. Justices StabrEr and Carter concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.E. 842, 170 S.C. 111, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-v-baker-sc-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack