McConnell & Bourland v. Ryan

1 White & W. 571
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedMay 30, 1881
DocketNo. 632, Op. Book No. 2, p. 241
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 571 (McConnell & Bourland v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConnell & Bourland v. Ryan, 1 White & W. 571 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1020. Jury; oath administered to; objections to, when to he made. The oath administered to the jury was that they would “well and truly try the issue joined between the parties.” Held, this form of oath has long been in [572]*572general use in this state, and is in substantial compliance with the statute. [Clements v. Crawford, 42 Tex. 601.] Objections to the form and manner in which a jury is sworn should be made at the time, so as to give the court an opportunity to correct the irregularity.

May 30, 1881.

§ 1021. Excessive judgment; remittitur; costs. The judgment being excessive, the appellee filed a remittitur of the excess, and the judgment was reformed in accordance with the remittitur, and the costs of the appeal adjudged against appellee.

Reversed and reformed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clements v. Crawford
42 Tex. 601 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnell-bourland-v-ryan-texcommnapp-1881.