McConnaughy v. Bennett

U.S. Circuit Court

McConnaughy v. Bennett

33 F. 455, 13 Sawy. 157, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237

DecidedJanuary 16, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. 455 (McConnaughy v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConnaughy v. Bennett, 33 F. 455, 13 Sawy. 157, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237 (uscirct 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Deady, J.

These eases were heard with the foregoing and the circumstances of the entry, occupation, and character of the land are similar. The several tracts of land claimed by the defendants are all embraced within the sale of swamp lands by the state, as shown in the foregoing opinion, under which the plaintiff: claims. They each claim one quarter section except one, who claims a half section. The settlement and improvement of each was [456]*456made in 1885, and in 1886 the hay, to recover which these several actions are brought, was cut and stacked on the land occupied by him. The land occupied by all the defendants is comprised in two tracts, not far distant, which lie on the margin and within the meandered line of Warner lake, near the .south boundary of the state.

. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, there must be a finding for defendant in each ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deady, J.

These eases were heard with the foregoing and the circumstances of the entry, occupation, and character of the land are similar. The several tracts of land claimed by the defendants are all embraced within the sale of swamp lands by the state, as shown in the foregoing opinion, under which the plaintiff: claims. They each claim one quarter section except one, who claims a half section. The settlement and improvement of each was [456]*456made in 1885, and in 1886 the hay, to recover which these several actions are brought, was cut and stacked on the land occupied by him. The land occupied by all the defendants is comprised in two tracts, not far distant, which lie on the margin and within the meandered line of Warner lake, near the .south boundary of the state.

. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, there must be a finding for defendant in each ease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. 455, 13 Sawy. 157, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconnaughy-v-bennett-uscirct-1888.