McConkey v. Tehuantepec Rubber Culture Co.

149 N.Y.S. 984
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 149 N.Y.S. 984 (McConkey v. Tehuantepec Rubber Culture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConkey v. Tehuantepec Rubber Culture Co., 149 N.Y.S. 984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sues as a holder of certain unpaid coupons detached from a mortgage bond made by the defendant. The only plea made by defendant, on this appeal, to sustain the judgment, is that it would be inequitable to permit the holder of these negotiable coupons to secure a preference over other creditors.

As this is no answer to a claim on the debt evidenced by the coupons, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 N.Y.S. 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconkey-v-tehuantepec-rubber-culture-co-nyappterm-1914.